4 ms·
Sounds like I'm interpreting it perfectly. You are implying surveillance capitalism is necessary because "certain people" can threaten, harass, maybe kill citi
by staplers 6y ago
Sounds like I'm interpreting it perfectly.
You are implying surveillance capitalism is necessary because "certain people" can threaten, harass, maybe kill citizens into participating because it makes "certain people" rich.
My sarcasm implies it's unnecessary. Further it is a net-negative to society and everyone knows it. Look at tobacco, oil, or coal.. eventually they lose their grip. Get real.
- oblio 6y agoI'm not saying its necessary or otherwise. I'm saying that it's here and getting rid of it will not be easy. Another example you might be familiar with if you're American, the US healthcare system, especially the private insurance system. How is getting rid of it going? :-)