> A false sense of security is worse than no security at all. True. But that isn't what is happening here. This is more "some level of security which is less

> A false sense of security is worse than no security at all. True. But that isn't what is happening here. This is more "some level of security which is less than absolute, and unclear what sense of security people will assume they have" We've seen "false sense of security" arguments used time and time again to oppose partial, imperfect safety interventions (seat belts in cars is a great example).