You are correct, on each and every count. However, none of that is related to what I tried to highlight. Sure, the US is (rightfully so) subjecting every compa

You are correct, on each and every count. However, none of that is related to what I tried to highlight. Sure, the US is (rightfully so) subjecting every company within its jurisdiction to US law, no matter on which market they operate. Sometimes they go even further and say non-US companies can be held liable, when they somehow interact with the USA or its citizens. That can sometimes become a bit dicey with jurisdictions, but even that is not the point here. The point is that a US-based company is operating on a market outside the US and (most likely) is operating in a way that is within the law of that market. To put bluntly: I don't give a #### about how the US treats companies on their territory, regardless where those operate. I care about US-based companies abiding to law wherever they do business. If they can not do that, they should cease to operate there. Whether it's the US government or something else that is to blame for the situation is irrelevant.