> you appear to consider FB/Twitter etc. to be "virtual public squares". They demonstrably are not this. At the very least, it would require legislation to make

> you appear to consider FB/Twitter etc. to be "virtual public squares". They demonstrably are not this. At the very least, it would require legislation to make them so. Yes, that is what I am saying. I am advocating for legislation to protect free speech on platforms like FB and Twitter in a similar (but not identical) way that the First Amendment protects free speech on a public street.