3 ms·
I hope this and projects like it spearhead a movement of ARM laptops outside of the Apple-sphere. I wonder if System76, for example, has their eyes on being th
by corytheboyd 6y ago
I hope this and projects like it spearhead a movement of ARM laptops outside of the Apple-sphere.
I wonder if System76, for example, has their eyes on being the first to market as “the Linux laptop on ARM”. Seems right up their alley.
Also worth noting that I understand that System76 and Apple are not comparable companies. One is a humble operation installing a custom Linux build on rebranded hardware, and the other is a vertically integrated powerhouse building it’s own hardware.
- fsflover 6y ago> I wonder if System76, for example, has their eyes on being the first to market as “the Linux laptop on ARM”. They are not the first already: https://www.pine64.org/pinebook-pro/ https://www.pine64.org/pinebook-pro/
- corytheboyd 6y agoAh yeah pine64! But how does it compare to the M1 performance? I should have explicitly stated that these ideal computers would match or outperform Apple’s hardware, since that is very much the case with current intel based MacBooks
- spurdoman77 6y agoPinebook does the typical "as cheap and low-end as possible" linux stuff. I would love to see ARM linux hardware manufacturer who would aim to create a high-end fanless powerhorse like mac mini.
- corytheboyd 6y agoYou and me both. I believe it will happen eventually, it seems inevitable now
- esclerofilo 6y agoMinor correction: The mac mini isn't fanless
- zucker42 6y agoThe problem is no other laptop manufacturer besides Apple has the capital and resources to build their own chip.
- bgorman 6y agoDefinitely not true, IP blocks are available for all critical features and chip layout can be outsourced. ARM has a Cortex-X chip available for licensing for anyone that wants a high performance CPU core. For example, HP (who also makes laptops) has custom ASICs running Linux in their printers.
- wmf 6y agoEven if you use all licensed IP the market might not be profitable enough to pay back the cost. We're talking about a $50M+ leap of faith.
- bgorman 6y agoHP had 10.2 billion in profit last year. Source: https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/HPQ/financials/annual/income-statement https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/HPQ/financials/annual... Certainly enough to take a 50 million dollar risk.
- SomaticPirate 6y agoNot just their own chip, arguable one of the highest performance ones. At Intel, the mobile division was simply trying to keep pace with Arm with Apple always a distant dream. Later at Arm, no one had any idea what the hell Apple was doing. They pay for the ISA and that is basically as far as I ever saw the collaboration going (besides poaching top engineers). Most interesting thing I ever saw was that they bought Intrinsity[1] to create custom EDA tools for them. There is a decent technical moat to overcome. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsity
- johnwalkr 6y ago