3 ms·

I've driven from NYC to FL and back a few times (Once in a Uhaul truck) in addition to NYC <-> Chicago. Never did I have trouble keeping lanes. If I did, it mea

I've driven from NYC to FL and back a few times (Once in a Uhaul truck) in addition to NYC <-> Chicago. Never did I have trouble keeping lanes. If I did, it meant that I was tired or fatigued. As a responsible driver that means I pull off the road at a rest stop and rest. If you have trouble keeping lanes and are not fatigued then I suggest you put your fucking phone down or see a doctor. This new trend of passing responsibility to technology has got to stop. It's fueld by greed, built on human laziness and fostered by stupidity. People need to grow up and accept responsibility.

gambiting 6y ago
The point is that you're not as fatigued with it. I've driven many many times between Amsterdam - Krakow(12 hour drive) and the last few times I've done it in a car that has active lane keeping. On those times I've arrived probably 50% as fatigued as in a car without it, without sacrificing any safety of the journey. >>As a responsible driver that means I pull off the road at a rest stop and rest. No one is saying otherwise. This technology doesn't allow you to drive further while tired. It stops you from becoming tired in the first place. >>People need to grow up and accept responsibility. And people need to grow up and see that some inventions are not as bad as they think they are ;-) >>suggest you put your fucking phone down or see a doctor I've flagged your comment because it isn't how conversations on HN should go like.