2 ms·
14 years "late" is not exactly accurate as the initial time projections were based upon full funding from the initial moments of the project - which was never a
by koheripbal 6y ago
14 years "late" is not exactly accurate as the initial time projections were based upon full funding from the initial moments of the project - which was never a realistic goal.
Similarly, the 20x budget overrun number makes two errors - 1. that the initial numbers were in today's inflation adjusted dollars (which they were not), and that project scope remained exactly the same - which it has not. Numerous aspects of the telescope have been enhanced/improved to accommodate additional science.
- nickff 6y agoThe project was supposed to take 10 years and is already at 24! That's simply atrocious, and saying that they didn't get everything they wanted to is a poor excuse. I ran the numbers for inflation adjustment, and 500MM in 1997 is equivalent to ~811MM today. That means the project is between 12x-20x over budget... not much of an improvement in my mind.