it's is a long as OSX. So it perfectly matches the 'long con' time frame. Just don't know why you go about calling amoral business strategies designed to benefi

it's is a long as OSX. So it perfectly matches the 'long con' time frame. Just don't know why you go about calling amoral business strategies designed to benefit from opensource without giving anything substantial back as a "con". There were alternatives to LLVM and patches to gcc that achieved the same. Apple option to bring llvm up by investing heavily in it has more to do with the licensing than technical aspects.