>We don’t have agreement on time because everyone has their pet argument for why this or that time standard has some marginal benefit for a given slice of the p

>We don’t have agreement on time because everyone has their pet argument for why this or that time standard has some marginal benefit for a given slice of the population. Meanwhile, we can all agree on that those marginal benefits pale in comparison to the measured harms of changing clocks twice a year. I'm confused. You contradict yourself from one sentence to the next. Can we not agree, or are we all in agreement? I say it's the former, not the latter.