3 ms·
I don't think there's a good, consistent way to limit "bad" speech, while allowing "good". I personally have no problems with anti-vaxxers, flat-earthers and co
by AlexTWithBeard 6y ago
I don't think there's a good, consistent way to limit "bad" speech, while allowing "good". I personally have no problems with anti-vaxxers, flat-earthers and conspiracy-theoretists being able to express themselves. I do have problems with something that doesn't fit the current narrative being declared a conspiracy theory by some group and banned on this basis.
- gnusty_gnurc 6y agoBingo. They get off easy by calling it authoritarianism. It's correctly called despotism.