> testament to the simplicity of Go Depends on who reads it I guess. Lispers would not see simplicity in Go, they would see all the different characters you ne

> testament to the simplicity of Go Depends on who reads it I guess. Lispers would not see simplicity in Go, they would see all the different characters you need to use, how some things are statements and others are function calls, conditionals, type definitions and they all have different syntax for themselves, instead of being the same. Both have their places for sure, but I wouldn't go so far to say Golang is simple because of this example. At least it's not Rust, I give you that. pub fn metadata<P: AsRef<Path>>(path: P) -> Result<Metadata>