3 ms·
This is fine. Whenever things change, some proportion of the userbase pushes back and wants to just keep things like they are. Not a problem, and doesn't mean t
by mpclark 6y ago
This is fine. Whenever things change, some proportion of the userbase pushes back and wants to just keep things like they are. Not a problem, and doesn't mean the change is not worthwhile.
I can't imagine anyone meeting WordPress for the first time today would say "It's great but I HATE that editor! Don't they have something a bit more... classic?"
- dazc 6y agoMoving from basic html to wordpress 'classic' with the 'visual' editor deselected is simple enough. Arriving at some weird 'blocks' editor - more likely wtf?
- forgotmypw17 6y ago>Whenever things change, some proportion of the userbase pushes back and wants to just keep things like they are. I think it's remarkable that Wordpress is not forcing the users' hand on this. I think developers handwave away the users' desire to keep things as they are much too often, often tactlessly referring to their user-UI symbiosis as "old" or "legacy". I think user choice and stability of UI is vastly underrated today and is only beginning to emerge as a property to optimize for. We're going to see more developers catering to the crowd who just wants to keep their current working version, because it takes about 10-20 years of computer use to become the grouch with Upgrade PTSD, and we're beginning to reach critical mass on it.
- john-shaffer 6y ago> I can't imagine anyone meeting WordPress for the first time today would say "It's great but I HATE that editor! Don't they have something a bit more... classic?" They don't know enough to say this. They just complain about how difficult and confusing WordPress is.