2 ms·
Disclaimer: I am not all that religious, even though I am interested academically, intellectually -- in all religions... I look at the Bible in the same way th
by peter_d_sherman 6y ago
Disclaimer: I am not all that religious, even though I am interested academically, intellectually -- in all religions...
I look at the Bible in the same way that a codebreaker looks at code; that is, I'm always trying to look at what is said in it (and other religous works) from different perspectives; the idea being that one or more perspectives may contain a gem or gold nugget or morsel or two of wisdom -- philosophical or otherwise...
I like to think that ancient people knew more than we give them credit for; however, let's remember that the Bible has had to make it through many years (and many censors/powers-that-be -- all of whom did not enshrine Free Speech the way that we do today in our Constitution) of Earth's history -- and so the result is that if one is to have any hope at recovering these "morsels of wisdom/understanding", then one quite literally has to "read between the lines"...
Normally I wouldn't submit a religious themed website to HN, however, I think this blog's author has done an excellent job in researching and putting together a whole bunch of scholarship on the subject...
Is she right in what she says?
I don't know; all I know is that the blog appears comprehensive, that is, in my opinion, worthy of further investigation for those with an interest in this subject...
- hcrisp 6y agoI don't think she is right. Her main argument in article stems from an assumption that denarius (day's wages) mentioned in one verse connects it to another book's unrelated verse that also mentions denarius. This seems absurd absent any other context. I have heard that Revelation has some 400 quotes or direct allusions to Old Testament references. You would be better off starting there.