3 ms·

I would be interested in the other SSL implementations: - https://github.com/awslabs/s2n https://github.com/awslabs/s2n - https://boringssl.googlesource.com/b

I would be interested in the other SSL implementations: - https://github.com/awslabs/s2n https://github.com/awslabs/s2n - https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl - https://bearssl.org/ https://bearssl.org/ Are these subpar implementations or there are other reasons not to use these?

l2dy 6y ago
> Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability. BearSSL is still beta-quality, s2n has not reached 1.0 (weekly releases are likely to break things), and BoringSSL has no guarantees of API or ABI stability.