6 ms·
In emergency medicine, you've got patients who are dead, and patients who are dead dead. Patients who are just dead might still be brought back. This isn't abo
by GavinMcG 6y ago
In emergency medicine, you've got patients who are dead, and patients who are dead dead.
Patients who are just dead might still be brought back. This isn't about them. Patients who are dead dead because they haven't responded to resuscitation efforts aren't going to be taken to the hospital, is all. And in a lot of places that's already the norm.
- Faaak 6y agoDon't they need to be brought to the hospital for organ donation though ?
- bitcharmer 6y agoThis would be the case only in those countries where everyone is a donor by default (unless explicitly you opt out). I don't think most countries have laws like that though.
- FlyMoreRockets 6y agoThe state where I live has opt-in organ donation option when you apply for a driver's license/state ID. As a retired EMT in a rural area, I encountered organ donation cases twice in my career. Once, the patient was flown out, the other time, the orgqan donation crew was flown in. The first case, the patient had suffered a gunshot wound to the head that spared the autonomic functions, he was breathing on his own.
- VBprogrammer 6y agoThe circumstances in which organ donation is viable are surprisingly rare. I have a friend who worked in a head injury specialist unit, naturally this was a pretty good source of donors. You ideally need someone who is alive but only by virtue of life support so that you have time to turn off the machine and get the processes started.
- saberdancer 6y agoIsn't the instruction in fact to limit resuscitation efforts to in field? To take it to an extreme, if someone collapses and has a heart attack near a hospital, by this instruction they would have to revive the person (get a pulse/breathing) before transporting them to a hospital. It sounds very different to what normal procedure would be. I am assuming that usually they try to get the pulse back but that they can continue to do that while in the ambulance (at least that's how it works in the movies). This change would limit that.
- DanBC 6y agoMovies give a very unrealistic example of chance of survival after heart attacks or cardiac arrest. People are likely to survive one, but not the other. You wouldn't know that from film where almost everyone survives.
- Noumenon72 6y agoCould you specify which one they survive, possibly using "former" and "latter"?
- robbiep 6y agoA ‘heart attack’ is an episode of myocardial ischaemia (restricted blood supply to the heart) usually through a blockage of an artery. Angina is a pain associated with myocardial ischaemia of a usually temporary nature. A cardiac arrest is the stoppage of the heart. Lots of people survive the first (apart for the 250,000 Americans for whom the first presentation of heart disease is sudden cardiac death), not so many survive the latter
- oasisbob 6y agoNormal procedures for emergency cardiac care are going to vary depending on where you are in the world. The general dichotomy is "stay and play" vs "scoop and run". https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2215-7_31 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2215-7_31
- GavinMcG 6y ago
- Quequau 6y agoI feel like there's a quote from "Princess Bride" in there but I guess now is not the time.