4 ms·
This. Google has had it in for affiliate sites for as long as I can remember, and they specifically dislike thin content. While the site has ~250 words of value
by alvah 6y ago
This.
Google has had it in for affiliate sites for as long as I can remember, and they specifically dislike thin content. While the site has ~250 words of value editorial at the top of the pages I've looked at, the descriptions of the products themselves are extremely thin (~30-50 words), and would likely fall foul of this Google policy:
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/affiliate-programs https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guideline...
"Pages of product affiliation where the majority of the site is made for affiliation and contains a limited amount of original content or added value for users."
Also, the site may not comply with this policy:
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/scraped-content https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guideline...
"Sites that copy content from other sites, modify it slightly (for example, by substituting synonyms or using automated techniques), and republish it"
While I have seen much poorer quality affiliate sites than this ranking in Google, IMO this model is on borrowed time. I think the way to survive in this market is by increasing the value:affiliate ratio, and diversifying income sources, so affiliate revenue isn't the sole focus.
- Syzygies 6y agoAgreed. I used to loathe the experience of trying to Google an Amazon alternative, and the first fifty links would be Amazon affiliates. I'd pay Google a subscription to simply block all affiliate links. I'd call these changes in Google's algorithms progress.
- visarga 6y agoThis could be handled locally, like uBlock. I'd like to have such a browser extension to re-filter and re-rank the search results, where I could simply ban/boost a keyword or a topic. The same extension could be applied to FB and Twitter as well - they too generate feeds that could be re-filtered and re-ranked.
- johnwdefeo 6y agoFair points. I don't scrape/spin any content, and I would argue that it's easier to write 500 words than 50, but I can see how my content might run afoul of an automated system. Plenty of the comments on this thread make similar points. Ironically, I know of a scraper site that mirrors Amazon's bestsellers list, reformatted as blog posts: https://gistgear.com https://gistgear.com - and it's growing like gangbusters.
- g051051 6y ago> it's growing like gangbusters For now...
- germanjoey 6y agoIs this the reason why top recipe results always contain the poster's entire life story before they ever show a list of ingredients?
- ihaveajob 6y agoThis. I keep telling my wife how much I hate recipe websites. There has to be a better way! And yet, you're probably right that this is the reason. It's insane how much they have favored this anti-pattern.
- graeme 6y agoThat plus you can’t copyright a recipe but can copyright a story. So it thwarts scrapers.