Techdirt didn't actually cite any factual errors. They complain that 60 Minutes made a bunch of mistakes due to their poor journalistic integrity then make a lo

Techdirt didn't actually cite any factual errors. They complain that 60 Minutes made a bunch of mistakes due to their poor journalistic integrity then make a load of unsubstantiated opinions. The fact that facebook and youtube will usually do the right thing out of their own good will isn't really a defense of 230. Nor is 60 Minutes making a pat statement that "230 is bad" as much as saying that disinformation is proliferating and there's very limited legal recourse under 230. There's no advocacy for a simple repeal. The presentation is factual.