>If you disagree look up the event and the paper then have a discussion about it. So the paper in question seems to be the NIMH's investigation of the subject

>If you disagree look up the event and the paper then have a discussion about it. So the paper in question seems to be the NIMH's investigation of the subject that draws heavily on the Kinsey Report. The Kinsey Report had some flawed sampling methods, but would still have been the best available research for that decision. The vote was 5800 for removal, 3800 against. You'd hope to see a stronger consensus based on the data, but not really a close vote. You seem to have heard the religious version of events, which does not attack the actual science of the decision but turns the event into a political one.