> If I had to write a performant library at work, I too might rely on CPU-specific assembly wrappers in my code. But IMO, such code has no place in a general-pu

> If I had to write a performant library at work, I too might rely on CPU-specific assembly wrappers in my code. But IMO, such code has no place in a general-purpose cross-language benchmark site. My guess is that other people would take your "performant library at work" premise as justification for including that code.