The article seems to gloss over an important aspect of Section 230, shielding sites and providers from legal liability from 3rd party content. It would open sit

The article seems to gloss over an important aspect of Section 230, shielding sites and providers from legal liability from 3rd party content. It would open sites and providers to frivolous libel lawsuits, something most small sites couldn't afford to fight in court, leaving only sites like Facebook and Twitter who could afford to deal with the legal ramifications.