A state of art network like GPT-3 fails to appeal to human emotions and sounds artificial, so as a wedge-issue(the actual term for thing like 'Shiri Scissors')

A state of art network like GPT-3 fails to appeal to human emotions and sounds artificial, so as a wedge-issue(the actual term for thing like 'Shiri Scissors') generator it wouldn't produce anything on the scale of human trolls(who actually understand psychology), besides the reputation of new user posting auto-generated trolling content will not be taken as seriously. A real troll would construct a narrative that is believable and appealing to a wide audience, without any controversial content: the controversy would comes from implications and analysis of statements in detail, i.e. the 'obviously controversial' parts are bad trolling that would detract from the position advanced: An AI trained to produce controversial content wouldn't understand such subtlety and produce directly inflammatory content.