3 ms·
I agree 100%! Though I think it might be dangerous to prepare for the "last disaster". It'll be some other system breaking next time, so I think we instead shou
by Scandiravian 6y ago
I agree 100%! Though I think it might be dangerous to prepare for the "last disaster". It'll be some other system breaking next time, so I think we instead should identify what systems that do not have some kind of redundancy and determine blast radius of those crashing
I'm good at not panicking about things I can't change, but I worry about some of my colleagues who find it difficult to not have control in these situations
I can't do anything to help them at the moment, so for now I'm heading to my couch with my analogue book :)