4 ms·
It doesn't. The status page is currently showing information about the outage. And the 100% uptime number is probably still correct, since it's only been out fo
by pluto9 6y ago
It doesn't. The status page is currently showing information about the outage. And the 100% uptime number is probably still correct, since it's only been out for a couple of hours.
- yjftsjthsd-h 6y ago> And the 100% uptime number is probably still correct, since it's only been out for a couple of hours. It's listed as "Uptime for the current quarter"; if they mean that as "calendar quarter", i.e. since the start of the year, then we aren't even 100 hours into the quarter so we should be well below 100% by now.
- pluto9 6y agoFair point.
- hunter2_ 6y agoYou might be correct, but why would anyone care about quarter-to-date as opposed to a rolling quarter ending now? The latter would mean that an outage of X duration will always reduce this statistic by the same amount regardless of how close the nearest calendar quarter boundary is, which seems like a superior quality for such a statistic to have.
- yjftsjthsd-h 6y agoThat would be a completely fair metric to publish, but it doesn't look like what Slack is publishing. Of course, it's possible that it is and it's just phrased somewhat poorly.