2 ms·
That's actually a worse argument, if I understand it correctly (are you claiming that the article is not interesting for HN readers?? It's frontpage position -
by virgilp 6y ago
That's actually a worse argument, if I understand it correctly (are you claiming that the article is not interesting for HN readers?? It's frontpage position - currently at #3 - seems to be a pretty convincing counter-argument. The article might not be interesting for you personally, but... that's not very relevant)
- gruez 6y ago>That's actually a worse argument, if I understand it correctly (are you claiming that the article is not interesting for HN readers?? Yes? Not every comment has to be pigeon holed into "This article is right" and "This article is wrong". >It's frontpage position - currently at #3 - seems to be a pretty convincing counter-argument A long time hn reader such as yourself must know about the phenomena of "upvoted not because of article content, but because of discussion"? >The article might not be interesting for you personally, but... that's not very relevant) It's not only that, the article doesn't even bother going into the most basic of rebuttals (as evidenced by the replies here). Overall it's a very shallow article. It might be fine for 2013 but not for 2021.