> • Functions with names like >!! and ->> To be precise, those are just function names, not syntax. But even Clojure having a more complicated syntax than Comm

> • Functions with names like >!! and ->> To be precise, those are just function names, not syntax. But even Clojure having a more complicated syntax than Common Lisp or Scheme is much simpler than Java, for example. Instead of f(x, y) it's (f x y), essentially.