The claim isn't that the explanation is incorrect or based on a faulty premise, they're saying that there was no explanation at all. Maybe they're right about

The claim isn't that the explanation is incorrect or based on a faulty premise, they're saying that there was no explanation at all. Maybe they're right about FB incorrectly flagging their ads, I'm not in a position to judge. However, they're making a misleading claim by saying this happened without explanation and leading with the image showing no Page Quality violations, since the affiliated Freebies page did apparently have numerous violations.