> Facebook decided they don't want to be a part of this type of content distribution Isn't that a slippery slope? In my country, Facebook decided not to ban so

> Facebook decided they don't want to be a part of this type of content distribution Isn't that a slippery slope? In my country, Facebook decided not to ban some right-wing posters for hate speech because the right-wing in power had managed to get one of their OWN into Facebook, who "advised" Facebook that fighting hate-speech from such people would adversely affect Facebook operation in India as the government in power won't be happy about it. This person also got Facebook to take down opposition ads during the elections, thus harming their electoral prospects. Source: Facebook and Narendra Modi: How FB’s policy head in India allowed a BJP politician to spread hate online so that it would not hurt its “business prospects” - https://churumuri.blog/2020/08/15/facebook-and-narendra-modi-how-fbs-policy-head-in-india-allowed-a-bjp-politician-to-spread-hate-online-so-that-it-would-not-hurt-its-business-prospects/ https://churumuri.blog/2020/08/15/facebook-and-narendra-modi...