4 ms·

> The final paragraph makes me sad - this company is entirely at the mercy of Facebook. The content is up, go read. Shared.com, fun.shared.com, see if you woul

• martin_a 6y ago
  Yeah, really not high-quality content, I don't want to read that stuff . Nevertheless that should not be the reason to kill your accounts without any prior notice after spending 60 million in ads.
• jyriand 6y ago
  Where there is demand, there is supply.
• CabSauce 6y ago
  This is hopefully the answer. Hopefully facebook is trying to improve their feed. It's absolute garbage.
• sb8244 6y ago
  I don't want to read their content, but why should I (or someone else) get to make the decision of what others choose to read? I see lots of stuff shared on Facebook that I just can't believe people are into, but they are really into it. Good for them for finding enjoyment in it. If I don't want to see that content, I can mute the person to clean up my feed. If the content doesn't violate any rules and people want to read it, then it has a place. If it does violate rules, then communicate those clearly. Given that, I think that this is most likely not an issue of rules violation but of Facebook not wanting the content on their platform (and not wanting to actually justify that).