>because they'll be "paid less", or less competent engineers will be promoted faster. The first thing is strictly true. Every union takes dues. It is not stric

>because they'll be "paid less", or less competent engineers will be promoted faster. The first thing is strictly true. Every union takes dues. It is not strictly true that pay/compensation will increase in all cases. The second thing is true a lot of the time. Unions tend to wind up using seniority as the primary metric for positions and compensations. Why ignore those things?