2 ms·
The site as a whole is a good start, I'd say. I like the filter setup, it may get unwieldy as the number of languages/subjects multiplies, so you'll want to thi
by saundby 18y ago
The site as a whole is a good start, I'd say. I like the filter setup, it may get unwieldy as the number of languages/subjects multiplies, so you'll want to think ahead on scaling.
I think a little less text in the bubbles on the about page is a good idea. You can catch it all in the backup text below if you've caught the reader with the short version above. But the page layout looks pretty good overall. Maybe give it one more coat of polish, then try a couple of divergent ideas and mock them up, then ask us to take a look and compare?
I'll admit to being favorably prejudiced toward your site's purpose, BTW, so my response may be more enthusiastic than you'd get from most of your targets. ;)
- yourmomis1337 18y agoYeah... the filter design is pretty much a short term fix, I'm not sure what the next stage in its evolution should be. Maybe start limiting the displayed keywords to the more popular ones, I dunno. I think I agree about the bubbles on the about page... I suppose it's better to have shorter text blocks and more bullet points, images, etc? I'm glad you like the site's purpose at least... it would be really unfortunate if we had designed this to solve a problem and everyone had just said, 'what problem?' ;)
- stou 18y agoI agree about the about page, and "we are working on it". And I know the filters are eventually going to become nearly unusable but I am hopping a clever idea presents itself before then. Also 'favorable prejudice' is always welcome... much preferred to hateful bias :)