>I think a similar system would be a reasonable compromise here as well. How would something like you're suggesting work? Under what circumstances would it be

>I think a similar system would be a reasonable compromise here as well. How would something like you're suggesting work? Under what circumstances would it be appropriate to moderate and under what other circumstances would it be inappropriate? Just as importantly, who gets to decide what's appropriate/inappropriate? And to whom would this apply? Section 230 applies to everyone, including you, me, HackerNews and your great aunt Sally. If we limit section 230's applicability, who decides where it should apply and where it shouldn't? I'm not objecting to your suggestion, I'd just like to understand how you see such a 'compromise' being implemented. I'd welcome your thoughts!