3 ms·
Honestly, his articles where so overwhelmingly obviously biased and lacking any sense of journalism that it was actually painful to watch the number of people o
by matthewmacleod 6y ago
Honestly, his articles where so overwhelmingly obviously biased and lacking any sense of journalism that it was actually painful to watch the number of people on this very site enthusiastically promote him as some kind of truth-seeking hero.
It's valid to oppose the Assange extradition, be concerned about the impact on free speech, and any number of other things; Murray is not a reliable narrator on any of these issues, so if you do want to examine his content remember to do so with an extremely heavy dose of skepticism.
- mantap 6y agoWhat specific incompatibility do you find between his reporting and the ruling? It seems to match quite well?
- ntsplnkv2 6y agoPeople on here have already made up their minds about Assange/Snowden etc, even if damning evidence came out against them, they would still find a way to spin it one way or another. Cases like these I doubt the truth will ever be known/come out. There is too much political BS surrounding it.