7 ms·
People never really left Rome: describing it as "post-apocalyptic" is IMO a bit misleading (a real post-apocalyptic cultural transition looks a lot more like wh
by _petronius 6y ago
People never really left Rome: describing it as "post-apocalyptic" is IMO a bit misleading (a real post-apocalyptic cultural transition looks a lot more like what happened to the north American native cultures in the aftermath of European contact than what happened on the Italian peninsula during the collapse of the western empire).
That said, as things like coastlines and rivers changed, settlement patterns evolved, and the post-Imperial city of Rome changed size and political importance, parts of the city that had been inhabited in ancient times did empty out and came to be dominated by abandoned ruins, some of which were quarried for their marble, others left to be buried by sediment and detritus.
I think a more apt comparison here is something like what happened to Detroit, but more so and over a longer period. A good overview using the example of the Forum can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Forum#Medieval https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Forum#Medieval
- shadowofneptune 6y agoYeah, post-apocalyptic was misleading. Better said that after the chaos that Italy fell into in the 500s, the cities were depopulated.
- mr_toad 6y agoThe population of Rome dropped by more than 95 percent, mostly due to war. It ceased to be a city and became a sparsely inhabited ruin. That’s pretty apocalyptic.
- Archelaos 6y agoI highly recommend Ferdinand Gregorovius: 'Geschichte der Stadt Rom im Mittelalter' (1859–1872). It is a fascinating read. Translations into English under the title: 'History of the City of Rome in the Middle Ages' are available here: https://archive.org/search.php?query=History+of+the+city+of+Rome+in+the+middle+ages https://archive.org/search.php?query=History+of+the+city+of+...