4 ms·

Wondering around the site I found this particular benchmark interesting https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/performance/nbody.html http

• stabbles 6y ago
  It's including compilation time and memory too, which I would consider a major flaw in the benchmarks game. If I wrap things in a function and run it a second time in the repl, this is what I get: $ JULIA_LLVM_ARGS="-unroll-threshold=500" ~/julia-b00e9f0bac/bin/julia -O3 --check-bounds=no julia> include("nbody.jl") run (generic function with 1 method) julia> @time run(50000000) -0.169075164 -0.169059907 2.044478 seconds (294.25 k allocations: 12.599 MiB, 8.89% compilation time) julia> @time run(50000000) -0.169075164 -0.169059907 1.867936 seconds (12 allocations: 1.750 KiB) So, the second time there's no compilation overhead, just like in Rust, C, C++.
  • ChrisRackauckas 6y ago
    Julia is not allowed to use its compiler (PackageCompiler.jl) but Rust and C are. It's really silly and imposed by the author of the benchmarks for no clear reason.