That's an interesting comparison. I can understand the argument that design patterns are just like learning another service or tool or library. But aggressive u

That's an interesting comparison. I can understand the argument that design patterns are just like learning another service or tool or library. But aggressive use of design patterns is taking a language we already agree on, say Rust or Javascript, and adding a dialect to the language that can easily divide the existing commonality we have within idiomatic use of the language. Design patterns just strike me as incredibly non-utilitarian, divisive and non-additive in a field that already struggles to find agreement. I wouldn't say adding a service, framework or external library to your stack is as divisive for code readability as being a big fan of utilizing design patterns.