3 ms·
I don't think that's the case. If you browse HN somewhat regularly, you'll see that a lot of times when a post makes it to the top (Or close enough) it's very l
by ericol 6y ago
I don't think that's the case. If you browse HN somewhat regularly, you'll see that a lot of times when a post makes it to the top (Or close enough) it's very likely that a related post will make the rounds pretty soon.
I think it's more related to people trying to ride the karma wave than "A coordinated takedown of ad tech companies". And it is effective, because it happens way too often.
- bigdict 6y agoI agree, I remember reading an article or a comment explaining this phenomenon on HN, with examples. Nevertheless it would be interesting if the idea of digital ads being ineffective snowballed to the point where it became like a self-fulfilling prophecy, and led to the demise of large companies that we think of as "giants" or "monopolies".
- pydry 6y agoOr a coordinated "strike" by major ad spenders. I'll bet that a lot of ad spend is zero sum. They'd probably rather share profits than boost google's.
- dang 6y agoYes, this was just a standard follow-up [1] and we did the standard counter-follow-up, which is to merge the threads. [1] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=follow-up%20by%3Adang&dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?query=follow-up%20by%3Adang&dateRang...
- bigdict 6y agoHi dang, I'm wondering is there a list of HN phenomena that you've noticed over the years? Examples would be: 1. follow-up submissions 2. an initial wave of critical comments followed by a wave of apologist comments 3. first page of comments occupied by a single top level comment with lots of descendants (you often post to draw attention to other pages of comments in these cases)
- dang 6y agoThere's no systematic list but I use links to HN Search (like in the GP) to refer to such patterns. There must be a hundred such categories by now. Eventually I may try to compile them into something more standardized.