3 ms·
"Fed with Styrofoam as the sole diet, the larvae lived as well as those fed with a normal diet (bran) over a period of 1 month" I do not believe this claim. P
by ars 6y ago
"Fed with Styrofoam as the sole diet, the larvae lived as well as those fed with a normal diet (bran) over a period of 1 month"
I do not believe this claim.
Polystyrene has only carbon and hydrogen - so where are the mealworms getting nitrogen for protein synthesis? If they are getting it from the air, that's pretty major, and I highly doubt it.
Another problematic claim:
"and the rest into mineralized organic material"
What mineral exactly are they making that is usable for plants? Carbon and Hydrogen would leave just CO2 and water as waste products. What could they possibly be making?
- aaron695 6y ago> I do not believe this claim. The biomass didn't increase for the Styrofoam eating mealworms. It did for the bran eating meal worms. Would that fit? 10.1021/acs.est.5b02661
- ars 6y agoIt makes sense. It implies the mealworms can use it for energy, but not for growth. It's basically a carbohydrate, they would need some protein, fat, and trace elements for proper growth.