3 ms·
I think Uber is to blame here, reading the story it is obvious that they bought ads from very shady sources/networks, probably they went for the cheapest CPC. Y
by janmo 6y ago
I think Uber is to blame here, reading the story it is obvious that they bought ads from very shady sources/networks, probably they went for the cheapest CPC. You get what you pay for.
- onion2k 6y ago"You get what you pay for" doesn't mean you deserve to be defrauded for choosing the cheap option.
- the_pwner224 6y agoOn the other hand, if you pay someone $20 to buy a brand new ApplePhone 12 XS Max, you should expect to not get the phone. The Twitter didn't mention anything about price; and it is possible that the fraudsters were actually charging a normal market rate; and nobody deserves to be defrauded for trying to get something for cheap; but if Uber was taking the cheapest option then it's hard to feel sympathetic towards them - they're a big company with lots of marketing people and they should know better.
- justin_oaks 6y agoIn reality, you get AT MOST what you pay for. There are plenty of cases where you get much less, or nothing at all, for what you pay for. This story goes to show that.