4 ms·
How much does it take CPU wise on the client? I use arq which does need an app on the server side, but it's bog slow in scanning your client and uploading new
by novok 6y ago
How much does it take CPU wise on the client? I use arq which does need an app on the server side, but it's bog slow in scanning your client and uploading new chunks, taking up a significant amount of CPU. While something like carbon copy cloner is orders of magnitude faster.
I'm upgrading to an M1 mac soon although, so that might not be as much of an issue anymore.
- _flux 6y agoDifficult to compare. I mean high CPU usage is good, it gets its job done faster, right?-) At least it is able to use multiple cores for it. Just started a backup and it seems the CPU usage stood still at at about 400%, varying from 90% to 900% at first, then I guess some second phase consumed 150%-200% CPU. I have AMD Ryzen 3900X. The increment seemed to take about 3 minutes with my 4M files. No idea really how much it changed compared to previous one, probably very little. Backup size was 320 gigabytes, and IO-wise the backing Ceph S3 was probably the bottleneck, not the local SSD.