5 ms·
> It is open source, but I wouldn't exactly call it free as in freedom due to GPL-incompatibility The CDDL is essentially the same license as the GPL except it
by craftkiller 6y ago
> It is open source, but I wouldn't exactly call it free as in freedom due to GPL-incompatibility
The CDDL is essentially the same license as the GPL except it only applies to the files under the CDDL as opposed to the GPL which imposes its rules to the entire project for every project that links it. Any software under the CDDL is exactly as free as in freedom as GPL code.
CDDL: https://tldrlegal.com/license/common-development-and-distribution-license-(cddl-1.0)-explained https://tldrlegal.com/license/common-development-and-distrib...
GPL: https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-general-public-license-v2 https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-general-public-license-v2
Short description of the difference in the terms section on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Development_and_Distribution_License#Terms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Development_and_Distrib...
- boomboomsubban 6y agoJust to further drive home the point, the FSF description of the license starts with >This is a free software license People are free to dislike ZFS, but it certainly is free software http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:CDDLv1.0 http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:CDDLv1.0
- MayeulC 6y agoI stand corrected on that point, thanks to both of you :)