3 ms·
I believe it was a mistake to decommission eLORAN (both US and Europe), for the reasons you mention. Thankfully we still have terrestrial frequency and time sta
by PoachedSausage 6y ago
I believe it was a mistake to decommission eLORAN (both US and Europe), for the reasons you mention. Thankfully we still have terrestrial frequency and time standards (although there was talk of shutting down WWV).
Now that the UK has been kicked out of Galileo, perhaps the government might think about reinstating eLORAN, it would be a good use for some the Longwave AM broadcast infrastructure that will be surplus in the next 10 years or so.
- throw0101a 6y agoThe UK had a go of it with eLORAN for a while, but no one else (France, Netherlands) seemed to have been interested, and so it was shelved AFAICT: * https://www.trinityhouse.co.uk/notice-to-mariners/27-15-enhanced-loran-discontinued https://www.trinityhouse.co.uk/notice-to-mariners/27-15-enha... * https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/europe-gives-up-on-eloran https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/europe-gives-up-o... South Korea is having a go at it: * http://www.digitaljournal.com/tech-and-science/technology/ships-ditch-gps-for-eloran-navigation-system-because-of-hacking/article/499423 http://www.digitaljournal.com/tech-and-science/technology/sh... A government or three (NATO?) have to decide on a system (eLORAN or other), publish standards, and buy a bunch of equipment (transmit and receivers) to kick start things.