4 ms·
As if moral rules of censorship ever be interpreted consistently. They are typically written down in a manner that suggests rule of law, but morality is always
by Blikkentrekker 6y ago
As if moral rules of censorship ever be interpreted consistently.
They are typically written down in a manner that suggests rule of law, but morality is always rule of men, and it's always horribly inconsistent.
- cheschire 6y agoThe inconsistency of morals is why courts exist.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Razengan 6y agoWhat about the inconsistency of courts?
- ulucs 6y agoThat's why higher courts exist
- sjwright 6y ago(Ten posts later) That's why we choose to offload most decision-making responsibilities to others.
- Blikkentrekker 6y agoRarely does a man enter into the legal profession without being affected by the mental disease called morality. Courts are extremely arbitrary and very often “find a way”.