The original case which was agreed with by the supreme court does have valid points. A warzone, regardless of if you believe in the war or not, is still a warz

The original case which was agreed with by the supreme court does have valid points. A warzone, regardless of if you believe in the war or not, is still a warzone. I don't like how the defense attorneys are trying to say its the same if someone was in a parking lot in the US or in Syria. Maybe I'm missing something, but it's just not the same.