5 ms·
It's weird that this is being framed as a boycott. It's more like complying with patent law (even if you don't like the patent and assuming it's actually valid
by carussell 15y ago
It's weird that this is being framed as a boycott. It's more like complying with patent law (even if you don't like the patent and assuming it's actually valid.)
Person B: "Hey, so what happened with your situation, where the patent holder demanded you either license it from them or discontinue use/manufacture/trade?"
Person A: "I'm now boycotting them."
Person B: "So... discontinue use/manufacture/trade."
- adolph 15y agoI think the difference is that there is is an user interface item that looks like it may result in in-app purchase but actually has a message to the user about why the feature doesn't work. This is different from not using in-app purchasing at all. I don't think Apple would approve an app with such a user interface item.