I mean,yes? :-) If I'm going to use something, it should be intuitive and usable. It should be fit for its purpose, especially with a myriad of single and mult

I mean,yes? :-) If I'm going to use something, it should be intuitive and usable. It should be fit for its purpose, especially with a myriad of single and multi purpose tools available to all. This doesn't feel like something I should justify too hard :-) Twitter is not a necessity of life. I don't have to use it. They want me to use it and if so they can/should make it usable. Its paradigm and user interface don't work for me personally (and particularly when people try to fit an article into something explicitly designed for a single sentence - it feels like a misuse of a tool,like hammering a screw) so I don't use it. And that's ok! I don't feel they are morally obligated to make it usable by me. It's a private platform and they can do as they please. But my wife is a store manager and taught me that "feedback is a gift" - if a customer will leave the store and never come back,she'd rather know why, rather then remain ignorant. She may or may not choose to address it but being aware and informed is better than being ignorant of the reasons. So at the end of it, rather than down vote, let me ask what is the actual crux of your argument? People shouldn't be discriminate? They should use optional things they dislike? They shouldn't share their preferences and feedback? Twitter is a great tool for long format essays? Or something we all may be missing?