4 ms·
This. I think the advantage is in ease of transport vs. wood and related wooden building materials. Furthermore, not every disaster site is going to have in sit
by jonnathanson 15y ago
This. I think the advantage is in ease of transport vs. wood and related wooden building materials. Furthermore, not every disaster site is going to have in situ wood on hand for building, let alone in a form suitable for any sort of ad hoc construction needs.
- run4yourlives 15y agoYou both completely missed my main point. You're aging the fact that these things provide better temporary structures than wood buildings, but as temporary structures, the current standard is modular tenting.