4 ms·

40 pages! That's intriguingly long. There's also a nice audio version.

• rgovostes 6y ago
  Yes, if you have 3.5 hours to spare!
  • joegahona 6y ago
    Yeah, that Audm player sucks. No controls to make it play at 1.5x or anything.
    • JZL003 6y ago
      Because I do this trick a lot of places, almost all these players use the default <video> tag of the browser for the actual decoding/playback. So you can use that tag's control's manually even if they don't give a button So for this, something like: $("video").playbackRate = 2 or whatever. It's nice even for players with controls (like YT) if you want more than 2x speed Also you can just look at the video tag's internal URL and just download and play however, offline :)
      • _nalply 6y ago
        I tried that out on Firefox and the maximum speed is about 12x. At about 5x you lose sound.
        • JZL003 6y ago
          Hah! Nice, I've never experimented that far. I seem to remember even audacity had trouble with >4x speed (but don't remember if I just couldn't keep up at all, or if it was just choppy quality)
          • _nalply 6y ago
            You need to resample sound. If you play sound faster everything will sound higher like Mickey Mouse. At 2 or 4 times the speed I think is a simple step, just omit every two or three of four samples. Anyway, this gives different distortions. I am Deaf so I don't hear the distortions but I understand sound in a mathematical way. At a sampling rate of 44.1k the highest representable sound is about 22kHz. At 4 times the speed this is only the fourth of it, about 5500 Hz. If higher sounds aren't filtered they will wrap around and re-appear as low frequency sounds. I imagine that this sounds very weird. And for n not being a power of two or at 8 times or more, you need to resample sound. Transform the samples into the frequency domain and back into the time domain but sped up. This is quite a mathematically heavy operation and probably there are other limits I don't know of.