3 ms·
The device we had was 1.3MP--rough the same resolution as the composite image discussed in this article. The camera core was expensive, but the lens actually co
by osamagirl69 6y ago
The device we had was 1.3MP--rough the same resolution as the composite image discussed in this article. The camera core was expensive, but the lens actually cost more than the sensor. Yes it was ITAR regulated.
As an example of what I would have expected, this product brief (not the device we were using, but similar) has a picture of the white house https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/mfc/documents/sensor-cores/mfc-sbf-sensor-cores-brochure.pdf https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/m...
- fpoling 6y agoI presume that was with 16 bits per pixel, which is not available in consumer cameras.
- mmaunder 6y agoThanks. Interesting link. I must admit I can’t help but admire Lockheed’s marketing with that whitehouse image. There’s a not-so-subtle message in there. Sounds like super interesting work!!
- schoen 6y ago(That building is the U.S. Capitol rather than the White House.)
- semi-extrinsic 6y agoThat's the Capitol building though, not the White House?
- osamagirl69 6y agoprobably - I have never actually been to DC
- jonah 6y agoThe company is Santa Barbara Focalplane. They're right around the corner from FLIR and Seek Thermal is right down the street. Lots of amazing tech in this little town.