> Is there somewhere they are saying the name is morally wrong? Literally that wording? No. But that's the same as a politician doing favors for their biggest

> Is there somewhere they are saying the name is morally wrong? Literally that wording? No. But that's the same as a politician doing favors for their biggest donor and then pretending there's no pay to play here since you didn't literally see him taking piles of banknotes in a smoke filled back room. Come on. > they made a commercial decision Yes but why? Because according to them it promotes objectionable items/behavior - that's a moral decision, it is also a commercial one but based on a moral judgment. A commercial decision is not a class on its own. It is taken based on some factors. What were the factors here if not that Apple finds the name/icon morally questionable?