Direct association, not remote association. The name is an intentional reference to a hard drug. The name isn't related to the functionality, but that's not wh

Direct association, not remote association. The name is an intentional reference to a hard drug. The name isn't related to the functionality, but that's not what is claimed. This restriction on drug references is spelled out in the terms, making it valid and non-arbitrary. That the terms themselves aren't "just" is a different matter altogether, but there is no argument for it but being valid.